Dan Brown´s Origin and Kirsch´s Dilemma

In Origin Dan Brown tries to describe a spontanous creation of life without a cause or conscious fingerprint. He lets Kirsch explain that kind of evoltion beeing a mix of entropy and order in the sense that entropy needs to organize matter to better share energy in the universe. So every organized matter and organismns are just entropic tools. Nice idea but Kirsch himself gave the answer when he reecognized that there must be a cause beeing programmed to the e-wave supercomputer to finally simulate a successfull miller-urey experiment. Kirsch programms the simulation to the cause of shareing energy in the most eficient way using most creative techniques. First Kirsch programmed it and second creativity as beeing an element are both deep hints towards that there must be a conscious act behind creation and evolution. In the moment kirsch programmed the simulation in that way he became the creator himself. Filling the system/simulation with creativity is like activating the ghost inside it. Kirsch´s obvious dilema is that he has finally proven  that a conscious factor is relevant in the eqation. Dan Brown himself describes this factor by letting Langdon speculate on DNA as beeing a code and not a pattern. And codes as such are always a sign of creation. But still he leaves it all open to nothing. He cant close the circle. Well nice in in my sense is that he describes technology as the upcoming species in symbiotic fusion with men. Kind of what i have foreseen too. But different. He doesnt make the last consequent move to describe technology as part of natures evolution as i do. So nature is forming out in technology – men is only natures tool in that sense.

To come back and explain one more time: evolution is a highly efficient mix of cognition and selfdynamics!

Where are we coming from?

we re living in a cybernetic Organism which is the world/system – best described as EMC8 – Energy is matter is consciousness at infinity. This implies the need for a nautral sourcecode. From that on we came from different levels of that hirachy which was always an entaglement of energy, matter and consciousness (and information) at its time bound to organise themselfs into higher structures by cognition and selfdynamics. The evolutionary mechanism! Wherever matter is is energy and consciousness at all levels interacting to create infinitly.

where are we going to?

As said before energy, matter and consciousness will furtherdevelop. In our times as accepting the machine beeing part of natures evolution it will turn out promoting it. For men the only way to survive is to hack natures sourcecode and synchronise with nature and technology to cope with the upcoming system. Nature will always be ahead of every development. The machine and men will just be fully integrated and learn to use ultimate natural means – using and trusting in natures primal force.

KenoNitroProject – the A and O



kybernetische Einheit neuer oder natürlicher Intelligenz transparenter Raum-Ordnung


a theory of the Machine (in honor to Gilbert Simondon)

Gilbert Simondon tried to find the ultimate theory of the Machine. He already understood the different indivuduations of Biology, Psychology and Sociology as a Phenomena resulting from the same source. He even tried to harmonise it with Informationtheory. So what he in my eyes started to understand was the that the evolution of technology is a process similar to the natural Evolution, in fact Technology is the part of the natural Evolution. He came to the point seeing that natural Mechanismns are unconscious implemented into Technologoy because human consciousness and Inventions are of deep natural origin. So the theory of a machine is as the theory of everything a theory o Nature. It shows that everything in Nature as in Technology results from three main elements Energy, Matter and Information (Information as the result of Consciousness) which are interacting in an infinite Network. We today see how social Networks are working, but excatly how these networks are working is how antsstates are running and cell- or atomcollectives are working. It is obvious that a natural algorithm (Sourcecode) is starting to get visible behind those human-technical Networks. So the theory of the machine is quiet simply the theory of Nature. Once we come to that point that technical Evolution and natural Evolution are overlappinig, the common sourcecode is found, it will end into a complete new Technology which is interacting with Nature in a new way. This path will then finally end into a posttechnology Society because Technology as we know it today will not be necessary anymore. The technical evolution is in natures sense nothing else then a mirrow of Nature to explain humans how nature is working. Once this is realized humans will be reintegrated into Nature again, the concious and evolutionary machine, Network itself. This means interaction of matter, mind and energy from human to nature and backwards as already possible in states of meditation and unconsciously praticed from everybody anytime.

Nature –> the theory of the Machine

intelligence-community / [AI-NI-CI]

Intelligence-community is describing the interconnection of artifical intelligence, natural intelligence and collective intelligence. As long as we are searching a break-through in the field of artificial intelligence it is important to understand what natural intelligence or consciousness is itself. Before we have not explored the mind itself we will not be able to create a artificial intelligence the way its really meant. And its meant to be an exact copy of the existing mind – with all its negative consequences. So while researching what natural intelligence is – its also research on the field of artificial intelligence. If EMC8 is right and a sourcecode is running behind too – it is of no need to create a artificial intelligence anymore – therefore it would be of need to decrypt the sourcecode and create interfaces that communicate with these levels of dynamic information within the matter. Once that state is reached – natural intelligence which is collective intelligence because its working in a infinite network  would  become artificial intelligence by itself. The breakthrough in the search of artificial intelligence is not creating a new kind of artificial intelligence which we think how it could be – its about simple to reinvent nature.

The same counts for the invention of quantum-computers. It is not necessary to invent them – its  only about to connect with the one and only quantum-computer “Nature” – and make its computational power accessible to technology.

reinvent nature